i.c.stars|* High Tea

Last week I had the great pleasure of joining one of the teams at i.c.stars|*. It is an organization I’ve been working with for my Social Enterprise class.  Every day the participants in this job-training program break for “High Tea” (sometimes even twice a day).  Outside community leaders come in and join them in their conversation.  I was lucky enough to be their guest.

i.c.stars|* High Tea

High Tea participants from left to right: Adam Frieberg (me), Amanda, Jonathan, Unique, Francois, Anastasia, Alfredo, Marissa, De Juan, and Lisa.

The i.c.stars|* students I talked with asked GREAT questions.  And it was fun how often the tone shifted; early in the conversation I heard about their past interactions as group members, and then the conversation shifted to my experience, and then they had lots of questions about how I blend my roles as minister, photographer, computer programmer, etc.  They quickly honed in on the questions I’ve been asking myself for the past seven years!

What a fun experience!

Gateway Drug

I have a problem with eggs.  I can’t eat them, when they’re in “egg form.”  So I can certainly eat French Toast, but can’t do omelets.  I have a gag reflex that kicks in and the eggs won’t go down.  I’ve been this way for as long as I can remember.  My family tells folk-loric tales (that are true) about my Grandma Pat trying to feed me eggs, thinking I’d outgrown my aversion to them.  It didn’t work.

Then, in 2003, Vy Nguyen, a college friend, convinced me to try Pad Thai.  It was SO good.  And then I noticed the little chunks of cooked eggs in it.  And it was still SO good.

DDH will occasionally do quiche Monday night dinners, and I’ll try whatever kind has the thickest crust.  But now Heidi and I are subscribed to a meat CSA — which means we get two-dozen eggs every month!  We’re now starting to make quiche as well.  Here’s a broccoli/mushroom one we made:

IMG_4496.jpg

I think I’ve found my gateway drug to work myself up to full omelets!

Thesis Presentation

I closed a chapter in my life on Wednesday.  My senior thesis, which I proposed in spring 2008 (but which I started planning in spring 2007), is now done!  

The thesis has three components: propose a topic at the end of the 2nd year, research and write it while taking a class in the winter quarter of 3rd year, and do a public presentation during the spring quarter of 3rd year.  I wish I could say that I (or many of my classmates) could follow that schedule, but the process was never that simple.

I planned to write how the process of engaging with images can be a sacramental encounter.  During the fall I read a bunch of sacramental theologians – especially Karl Rahner – and was primed to start writing.  I had also read several image theorists, including James Elkins, W.J.T. Mitchell, Susan Sontag, David Freedberg and David Morgan.  With four weeks left in the winter quarter colloquium, my classmates and professors/advisors told me that Rahner was not helping me.  I was using too broad of a definition of sacrament, even for Rahner.  So I switched theologians mid-course and started reading everything I could find from Paul Tillich on symbol and art (two very different things in his usage).

Three weeks ago, I was putting the finishing touches on the thesis when I had my wife Heidi edit it for me.  As she said, my ending “jumped the shark.”  And it did.  So, after another two days of revision, it was ready.  It felt SO good to hand in.  Here it is:

PDF of Thesis

MDiv senior thesis University of Chicago Divinity School

After handing in the paper, I had to rush to get the presentation finished.  The three days leading up to the thesis were the most hectic. My content was there, but it wasn’t organized and the graphics weren’t even close to ready.  I spent at least a day trying to see how to visibly show Paul Tillich’s characteristics of “symbols”.  I went to a stock graphic to show the crucifixion:

The Crucifixion

The Crucifixion

But there was a problem.  In the Bible, the crucifixion contained women!  But in this image, they were missing!  A couple of swift fixes and this image was salvaged from being theological blasphemy.

Inclusive Crucifixion

Inclusive Crucifixion

Then came the time to visualize Tillich’s framework.  Here’s what took me a day to create (although most of the work was making the graphics interactive … something that’s too complicated to go on the blog):

Tillich Symbol

 A symbol:

  • points beyond itself to something else;
  • participates in that to which it points;
  • opens up levels of reality which otherwise are closed for us;
  • unlocks dimensions and elements of our own soul which correspond to the dimensions and elements of reality;
  • cannot be produced intentionally (it must grow out of and be accepted by the unconscious dimension of our being);
  • grows and dies (they grow when the situation is ripe for them and they die when the situation changes)

My presentation was fun.  It was well attended and the questions were deep — so deep, that at times, I didn’t know what my friends were asking.  I was even lucky enough for my parents to drive over from Iowa for the night.  But what one thing would you expect me not to forget?  To take a picture, right?

I had the flashes and camera set up.  But unfortunately, I completely spaced out getting a group picture once the presentation was underway.  Alas, here’s the empty room before my friends came and set it up:

IMG_4488.jpg

I’ll post video and audio (and maybe even my slides) once I have them imported.  Don’t hold your breath … it’ll probably be at least two weeks while I finish my last Div. School papers.  (YAY!!!)

Lucky

I’m a lucky guy.

IMG_4418.jpg

Tuesday began in a crappy way.  The night before, my car was broken into and someone stole my $250 GPS unit off the front windshield.  The thief was smart enough to knock down most of the shattered glass so as to make it not obvious that the window was broken.  It took me until I was 10 feet away to notice it.  The thief even reached in and took the power plug out of the cigarette lighter.  The thief ignored the CDs (an “unreleased” U2 album, in fact!).  But all, in all, I’m super lucky.

I’m lucky the thief didn’t look into the back seat and see the much more expensive tripod on the floor.  And I’m lucky the thief didn’t pop the trunk and take the 8-channel sound mixer I’d used the previous two weeks while doing tech. support for conferences.  I’m lucky I was close to DDH and could use the House’s shop vacuum to get most of the glass out of my car.  I’m lucky that Bruce, DDH’s maintenance guru and groundskeeper, knew of a place called Fernandez’s.

I’d link to this place, but they don’t have a web site.  In fact, I was having a horrible time finding their number on Google Maps.  But I knew they were at 51st and Ashland in Chicago.  So I went to the Google Maps street view option and used the traffic cameras to look at the side of their building, which conveniently had their number.  Then I called them and they said they only had a new one in stock; only a new one?  Sounded great to me!  They fixed the window in about 60 minutes and it only cost $100!  $100 for window and installation; they’re incredible!

I’m still a little irked about the window, but thankful I’m lucky and that neither I nor the thief were hurt by the glass.

Ministry Conference (Change of Heart)

Friday and Saturday was the University of Chicago Divinity School’s annual ministry conference.  This is the fifth annual student-led conference.  This year’s theme: “From the Ends of the Earth: Christianity in the 21st Century.”  What does that mean?  Well, luckily the conference organizers gave a full paragraph to unpack the potential meanings:

How will the co-incidence of the post-colony with the failures of nationalism influence new forms of Christian leadership? How, in turn, will developing forms of Christianity demand and resist new approaches to cooperation and unity? Finally, how do these things influence and even produce new self-understanding for the Church in America? While building on important efforts of social scientists and missiologists, the 5th Annual Ministry Conference of the University of Chicago Divinity School will approach these topics with specifically ministerial and ecclesiological lenses. This conference seeks (1) to help deepen understanding among ministers, students and lay-persons as well as professional academics of certain realities and potential futures of being Christian around the world and (2) to equip the same with resources for engaging the issues of the conference further.

For such a lofty goal, the conference succeeded.

I went into the conference as a tired, worn out student.  I helped do tech. support for the two-day conference “Theologizing Cultures, Culturing Theologies” last week and this conference was going to be more demanding.  I woke up at 6:30 a.m. on Friday and drove to Hyde Park to do all of the tech. setup and logistics before the conference began.  The biggest reason I was grumpy that morning was because I hadn’t found out it was a two-day conference until the week before!  All of the Divinity School’s official communications had said the conference was from 9-5 on Friday; but alas, I should have talked to my friends instead of reading the “At the Divinity School” bulletin.  

The conference, like many ministry conferences, began with worship.  Dr. Soong-Chan Rah, a Baptist minister and professor at North Park Seminary, preached.

IMG_4068.jpg

Worship was good, but I felt under fire with the first keynote speaker.  Dr. Kwok Pui lan, a professor at Episcopal Divinity School, was presenting and was nervous about the laptop and projector/lighting situation.  There wasn’t much we could do to change the circumstances, but thankfully it went well and she and I had a conversation later in the day that relieved some of the tension.

IMG_4110.jpg

The content of her presentation was good, but her responses to the question/answer section were even better!  Without the shackles of Powerpoint, she was super-relevant and pointing out implications for Christian mission that deserved her nuance.  Her Powerpoint presentation, however, was aesthetically beautiful on her laptop screen (pastel colors and all!), but showed up too faded and hard to read on the larger screen.  I need to say it more, but if in doubt, DON’T USE PRESENTATION PROGRAMS.  Or, if you’re going to, at least spend a month soaking up Presentation Zen – a superb guide to design, simplicity, and messages!

Dwight Hopkins, a prof. at the Div. School, was her respondent.  I thought it was funny when she was talking about him WHILE HE WAS SITTING RIGHT THERE!

IMG_4088.jpg

Another reason I wasn’t looking forward to the conference was because the two-days seemed too long and draining.  I had a major change of heart, however, after lunch when I still had energy.  With most conferences, there are three events crammed before lunch and then an exhausting afternoon of non-stop panels.  This schedule, however, gave breaks was more humane.

After lunch, three practitioners gave presentations and then had a Q&A panel where they talked to each other and to the audience.  Dr. Rah, Teresita Valeriano, and Carmen Nanko-Fernández (who happens to be replacing Ed Foley as the CTU D.Min. program director) all gave great talks.

IMG_4209.jpg

As if that wasn’t enough content, the conference had an art gallery in the Divinity School common room, with photography by David Johnson (www.dwjohnson.net) — whose photographs were RIVETING!

Then came the banquet dinner and the lecture I was looking forward to most: William Dyrness.  Bethany Lowery would be proud; I think I have one of my first Professor crushes; I love his books!  Can you see why?

I’ll post a podcast link at some point to the conference audio/video for those who wouldn’t make it!